Argument Mining: Structure and Quality of Arguments
Module: Natural Language Processing | Difficulty: Advanced
Argument Components
- Claim: Statement to be supported
- Premise: Evidence supporting claim
- Warrant: Assumption connecting premise to claim
Relation Classification
Argument Quality
Evaluation
| Task | Metric | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Component Detection | F1 | 78.3 |
| Relation Classification | F1 | 72.1 |
| Quality Assessment | Correlation | 0.65 |
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
class ArgumentMiner(nn.Module):
def __init__(self, bert_model, n_components, n_relations):
super().__init__()
self.bert = bert_model
self.component_detector = nn.Linear(768, n_components)
self.relation_classifier = nn.Linear(768*2, n_relations)
def forward(self, input_ids, attention_mask):
outputs = self.bert(input_ids, attention_mask=attention_mask)
cls_output = outputs.last_hidden_state[:, 0]
return self.component_detector(cls_output)
Research Insight: Argument mining is crucial for understanding persuasive text and automated reasoning. The key challenge is that arguments are often implicit and require world knowledge to understand. Pre-trained language models improve argument mining by 15-20%.