← Math|92 of 100
Complex Analysis

Complex Functions

Understand complex functions, analyticity, Cauchy-Riemann equations, and conformal mappings.

πŸ“‚ FunctionsπŸ“– Lesson 92 of 100πŸŽ“ Free Course

Advertisement

Why It Matters

ℹ️ Why It Matters

Complex functions are fundamentally different from real functions in ways that have profound consequences. A function that is differentiable once in the complex sense is automatically infinitely differentiable and analytic (representable by a power series) β€” a rigidity with no real-variable counterpart. This extraordinary property makes complex analysis far more powerful than real analysis in many contexts. Analytic functions preserve angles (conformal mappings), enabling the solution of Laplace's equation in complicated geometries used in fluid flow, electrostatics, and heat conduction. The Cauchy-Riemann equations provide a clean test for analyticity, connecting the partial derivatives of the real and imaginary parts. Understanding complex functions is essential for residue calculus, the study of Riemann surfaces, and applications in engineering and physics where frequency-domain analysis is indispensable.


Core Definitions

DfComplex Function

A complex function is a mapping f:Dβ†’Cf: D \to \mathbb{C} where DβŠ†CD \subseteq \mathbb{C}, assigning to each z∈Dz \in D a value w=f(z)∈Cw = f(z) \in \mathbb{C}. Writing z=x+iyz = x + iy and f(z)=u(x,y)+iv(x,y)f(z) = u(x,y) + iv(x,y), the function has real part uu and imaginary part vv, both functions of two real variables.

DfLimit of a Complex Function

We say lim⁑zβ†’z0f(z)=L\lim_{z \to z_0} f(z) = L if for every Ξ΅>0\varepsilon > 0 there exists Ξ΄>0\delta > 0 such that ∣f(z)βˆ’L∣<Ξ΅|f(z) - L| < \varepsilon whenever 0<∣zβˆ’z0∣<Ξ΄0 < |z - z_0| < \delta.

DfComplex Derivative

The derivative of ff at z0z_0 is fβ€²(z0)=lim⁑hβ†’0f(z0+h)βˆ’f(z0)hf'(z_0) = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(z_0 + h) - f(z_0)}{h}, provided the limit exists and is independent of the direction from which hβ†’0h \to 0.

DfAnalytic (Holomorphic) Function

A function ff is analytic (holomorphic) at z0z_0 if fβ€²(z0)f'(z_0) exists in some open neighborhood of z0z_0. If ff is analytic at every point in a domain DD, we say ff is analytic on DD. A function analytic on all of C\mathbb{C} is called entire.

DfHarmonic Function

A real-valued function Ο•(x,y)\phi(x,y) with continuous second partial derivatives satisfying Laplace's equation βˆ‡2Ο•=βˆ‚2Ο•βˆ‚x2+βˆ‚2Ο•βˆ‚y2=0\nabla^2 \phi = \frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial y^2} = 0 is called harmonic. The real and imaginary parts of any analytic function are harmonic.

DfConformal Mapping

A mapping w=f(z)w = f(z) is conformal at z0z_0 if it preserves the angle (both magnitude and orientation) between any two smooth curves passing through z0z_0. Analytic functions with fβ€²(z0)β‰ 0f'(z_0) \neq 0 are conformal at z0z_0.

DfSingular Point

A point z0z_0 where ff is not analytic is called a singular point (or singularity). If ff is analytic in a punctured disk 0<∣zβˆ’z0∣<R0 < |z - z_0| < R but not at z0z_0, then z0z_0 is an isolated singularity.

DfMeromorphic Function

A function that is analytic in a domain DD except for isolated poles (singularities where ff behaves like 1/(zβˆ’z0)n1/(z-z_0)^n) is called meromorphic on DD.


Key Formulas

Cauchy-Riemann Equations

βˆ‚uβˆ‚x=βˆ‚vβˆ‚y,βˆ‚uβˆ‚y=βˆ’βˆ‚vβˆ‚x\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}, \quad \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} = -\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}

Here,

  • u(x,y)u(x,y)=Real part of f(z) = u + iv
  • v(x,y)v(x,y)=Imaginary part of f(z) = u + iv

Derivative in Terms of Partial Derivatives

fβ€²(z)=βˆ‚uβˆ‚x+iβˆ‚vβˆ‚x=βˆ‚vβˆ‚yβˆ’iβˆ‚uβˆ‚yf'(z) = \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + i\frac{\partial v}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial v}{\partial y} - i\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}

Here,

  • βˆ‚uβˆ‚x\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}=Partial of real part w.r.t. x
  • βˆ‚vβˆ‚x\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}=Partial of imaginary part w.r.t. x

Laplace's Equation

βˆ‡2Ο•=βˆ‚2Ο•βˆ‚x2+βˆ‚2Ο•βˆ‚y2=0\nabla^2 \phi = \frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial y^2} = 0

Here,

  • βˆ‡2\nabla^2=Laplacian operator
  • Ο•(x,y)\phi(x,y)=Harmonic function

Conjugate Harmonic Functions

v(x,y)=βˆ«βˆ‚uβˆ‚ydx+CorΒ viaΒ Cauchy-Riemannv(x,y) = \int \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} dx + C \quad \text{or via Cauchy-Riemann}

Here,

  • uu=Known harmonic function (real part)
  • vv=Conjugate harmonic function (imaginary part)

MΓΆbius Transformation

w=f(z)=az+bcz+d,adβˆ’bcβ‰ 0w = f(z) = \frac{az + b}{cz + d}, \quad ad - bc \neq 0

Here,

  • a,b,c,da, b, c, d=Complex constants with ad - bc β‰  0
  • zz=Complex variable

Polar Form of Cauchy-Riemann

βˆ‚uβˆ‚r=1rβˆ‚vβˆ‚ΞΈ,βˆ‚vβˆ‚r=βˆ’1rβˆ‚uβˆ‚ΞΈ\frac{\partial u}{\partial r} = \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial v}{\partial \theta}, \quad \frac{\partial v}{\partial r} = -\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial u}{\partial \theta}

Here,

  • rr=Radial coordinate in polar form
  • ΞΈ\theta=Angular coordinate in polar form

Complex Exponential

ez=ex+iy=ex(cos⁑y+isin⁑y)e^z = e^{x+iy} = e^x(\cos y + i\sin y)

Here,

  • z=x+iyz = x + iy=Complex variable
  • exe^x=Modulus of e^z
  • yy=Argument of e^z

Complex Trigonometric Functions

sin⁑z=eizβˆ’eβˆ’iz2i,cos⁑z=eiz+eβˆ’iz2\sin z = \frac{e^{iz} - e^{-iz}}{2i}, \quad \cos z = \frac{e^{iz} + e^{-iz}}{2}

Here,

  • zz=Complex variable
  • iziz=Imaginary multiple of z

Important Theorems

ThCauchy-Riemann Equations (Necessary and Sufficient Conditions)

Let f(z)=u(x,y)+iv(x,y)f(z) = u(x,y) + iv(x,y) be defined on a domain DD.

Necessary condition: If fβ€²(z0)f'(z_0) exists at some point z0=x0+iy0z_0 = x_0 + iy_0, then the partial derivatives of uu and vv exist at (x0,y0)(x_0, y_0) and satisfy:

βˆ‚uβˆ‚x=βˆ‚vβˆ‚y,βˆ‚uβˆ‚y=βˆ’βˆ‚vβˆ‚x\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}, \quad \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} = -\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}

Sufficient condition: If the four partial derivatives of uu and vv exist, are continuous at (x0,y0)(x_0, y_0), and satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations, then ff is analytic at z0z_0.

Proof sketch (necessity): Consider hβ†’0h \to 0 along the real axis: f(z0+h)βˆ’f(z0)h=u(x0+h,y0)βˆ’u(x0,y0)h+iv(x0+h,y0)βˆ’v(x0,y0)hβ†’ux+ivx\frac{f(z_0+h) - f(z_0)}{h} = \frac{u(x_0+h,y_0) - u(x_0,y_0)}{h} + i\frac{v(x_0+h,y_0) - v(x_0,y_0)}{h} \to u_x + iv_x. Along the imaginary axis (h=ikh = ik): f(z0+ik)βˆ’f(z0)ik=u(x0,y0+k)βˆ’u(x0,y0)ik+iv(x0,y0+k)βˆ’v(x0,y0)ikβ†’βˆ’iuy+vy\frac{f(z_0+ik) - f(z_0)}{ik} = \frac{u(x_0,y_0+k) - u(x_0,y_0)}{ik} + i\frac{v(x_0,y_0+k) - v(x_0,y_0)}{ik} \to -iu_y + v_y. Equating real and imaginary parts gives the Cauchy-Riemann equations.

ThAnalyticity Implies Infinite Smoothness

If ff is analytic in a domain DD, then ff has derivatives of all orders in DD, and ff is equal to its Taylor series expanded about any point in DD. This is fundamentally different from real analysis, where a function can be differentiable once but not twice.

Implication: Analytic functions are extraordinarily rigid. If two analytic functions agree on any set with a limit point in DD, they are identical throughout DD (Identity Theorem).

ThHarmonic Conjugate Theorem

If u(x,y)u(x,y) is harmonic in a simply connected domain DD, then there exists a unique (up to a constant) harmonic function v(x,y)v(x,y) such that f(z)=u+ivf(z) = u + iv is analytic. The function vv is called the harmonic conjugate of uu.

Construction: Given uu, use vx=βˆ’uyv_x = -u_y and vy=uxv_y = u_x, then integrate to find vv.

ThConformal Mapping Property

If ff is analytic at z0z_0 and fβ€²(z0)β‰ 0f'(z_0) \neq 0, then ff is conformal at z0z_0: it preserves the angle between any two smooth curves through z0z_0, both in magnitude and orientation.

Geometric meaning: Near z0z_0, ff acts like a rotation (by arg⁑fβ€²(z0)\arg f'(z_0)) and a scaling (by ∣fβ€²(z0)∣|f'(z_0)|). Small shapes are preserved up to rotation and scaling.

ThClassification of Singularities

Let ff have an isolated singularity at z0z_0. Exactly one of the following holds:

  1. Removable singularity: ff can be redefined at z0z_0 to be analytic. The Laurent series has no negative-power terms.
  2. Pole of order nn: f(z)∼cβˆ’n/(zβˆ’z0)nf(z) \sim c_{-n}/(z-z_0)^n as zβ†’z0z \to z_0, with cβˆ’nβ‰ 0c_{-n} \neq 0. The Laurent series has finitely many negative-power terms.
  3. Essential singularity: The Laurent series has infinitely many negative-power terms. By the Casorati-Weierstrass theorem, ff comes arbitrarily close to every complex value in any neighborhood of z0z_0.

ThMaximum Modulus Principle

If ff is analytic and non-constant in a bounded domain DD and continuous on Dβ€Ύ\overline{D}, then ∣f∣|f| attains its maximum on the boundary βˆ‚D\partial D, never in the interior.

Corollary: If ff is analytic on a bounded domain and ∣f∣|f| has a local maximum in the interior, then ff is constant.


Worked Examples

πŸ“Example 1: Testing Analyticity with Cauchy-Riemann Equations

Determine whether f(z)=z2f(z) = z^2 is analytic.

Step 1: Write z2=(x+iy)2=x2βˆ’y2+2xyiz^2 = (x+iy)^2 = x^2 - y^2 + 2xyi, so u=x2βˆ’y2u = x^2 - y^2 and v=2xyv = 2xy.

Step 2: Compute partial derivatives: ux=2xu_x = 2x, uy=βˆ’2yu_y = -2y, vx=2yv_x = 2y, vy=2xv_y = 2x.

Step 3: Check Cauchy-Riemann: ux=2x=vy=2xu_x = 2x = v_y = 2x βœ“ and uy=βˆ’2y=βˆ’vx=βˆ’2yu_y = -2y = -v_x = -2y βœ“.

The equations are satisfied everywhere, and the partials are continuous everywhere. Therefore f(z)=z2f(z) = z^2 is entire (analytic on all of C\mathbb{C}).

Derivative: fβ€²(z)=ux+ivx=2x+2yi=2zf'(z) = u_x + iv_x = 2x + 2yi = 2z.

πŸ“Example 2: Non-Analytic Function

Show that f(z)=zβ€Ύ=xβˆ’iyf(z) = \overline{z} = x - iy is not analytic anywhere.

Step 1: u=xu = x, v=βˆ’yv = -y.

Step 2: ux=1u_x = 1, vy=βˆ’1v_y = -1. Since uxβ‰ vyu_x \neq v_y (1β‰ βˆ’11 \neq -1), the Cauchy-Riemann equations fail everywhere.

Conclusion: zβ€Ύ\overline{z} is not analytic at any point. This function is real-differentiable everywhere but not complex-differentiable.

πŸ“Example 3: Finding the Harmonic Conjugate

Given u(x,y)=x2βˆ’y2u(x,y) = x^2 - y^2 (which is harmonic since uxx+uyy=2+(βˆ’2)=0u_{xx} + u_{yy} = 2 + (-2) = 0), find vv such that f(z)=u+ivf(z) = u + iv is analytic.

Step 1: From Cauchy-Riemann: vy=ux=2xv_y = u_x = 2x and vx=βˆ’uy=2yv_x = -u_y = 2y.

Step 2: Integrate vy=2xv_y = 2x with respect to yy: v=2xy+g(x)v = 2xy + g(x) for some function g(x)g(x).

Step 3: Differentiate with respect to xx: vx=2y+gβ€²(x)v_x = 2y + g'(x). Set equal to 2y2y: gβ€²(x)=0g'(x) = 0, so g(x)=Cg(x) = C.

Result: v(x,y)=2xy+Cv(x,y) = 2xy + C, and f(z)=(x2βˆ’y2)+i(2xy+C)=z2+iCf(z) = (x^2 - y^2) + i(2xy + C) = z^2 + iC.

πŸ“Example 4: Conformal Mapping β€” MΓΆbius Transformation

Consider w=f(z)=zβˆ’iz+iw = f(z) = \frac{z - i}{z + i}. Show it maps the real axis to the unit circle.

Step 1: For z=x∈Rz = x \in \mathbb{R}: ∣w∣=∣xβˆ’ix+i∣=∣xβˆ’i∣∣x+i∣=x2+1x2+1=1|w| = \left|\frac{x - i}{x + i}\right| = \frac{|x - i|}{|x + i|} = \frac{\sqrt{x^2 + 1}}{\sqrt{x^2 + 1}} = 1.

So the real axis maps to the unit circle ∣w∣=1|w| = 1.

Step 2: Check specific points: f(0)=βˆ’ii=βˆ’1f(0) = \frac{-i}{i} = -1, f(1)=1βˆ’i1+i=(1βˆ’i)22=βˆ’2i2=βˆ’if(1) = \frac{1-i}{1+i} = \frac{(1-i)^2}{2} = \frac{-2i}{2} = -i, f(βˆ’1)=βˆ’1βˆ’iβˆ’1+i=(βˆ’1βˆ’i)(βˆ’1βˆ’i)(βˆ’1+i)(βˆ’1βˆ’i)=1+2iβˆ’12=if(-1) = \frac{-1-i}{-1+i} = \frac{(-1-i)(-1-i)}{(-1+i)(-1-i)} = \frac{1+2i-1}{2} = i.

Step 3: Where does f(z)=0f(z) = 0? When z=iz = i. Where does f(z)=∞f(z) = \infty? When z=βˆ’iz = -i. The point ii maps to the origin; the point βˆ’i-i maps to infinity.

This MΓΆbius transformation maps the upper half-plane to the interior of the unit disk.

πŸ“Example 5: Complex Exponential and Logarithm

Compute e1+iΟ€/2e^{1 + i\pi/2} and log⁑(βˆ’1)\log(-1).

Part (a): e1+iΟ€/2=e1β‹…eiΟ€/2=e(cos⁑(Ο€/2)+isin⁑(Ο€/2))=e(0+i)=eie^{1 + i\pi/2} = e^1 \cdot e^{i\pi/2} = e(\cos(\pi/2) + i\sin(\pi/2)) = e(0 + i) = ei

Part (b): log⁑(z)=ln⁑∣z∣+iarg⁑(z)\log(z) = \ln|z| + i\arg(z). For z=βˆ’1z = -1: ∣z∣=1|z| = 1, arg⁑(βˆ’1)=Ο€+2kΟ€\arg(-1) = \pi + 2k\pi.

log⁑(βˆ’1)=ln⁑1+i(Ο€+2kΟ€)=i(2k+1)Ο€\log(-1) = \ln 1 + i(\pi + 2k\pi) = i(2k+1)\pi for any integer kk.

The principal value is Log⁑(βˆ’1)=iΟ€\operatorname{Log}(-1) = i\pi.

πŸ“Example 6: Classifying Singularities

Classify the singularity of f(z)=ezz2f(z) = \frac{e^z}{z^2} at z=0z = 0.

Step 1: Expand ez=1+z+z22!+z33!+β‹―e^z = 1 + z + \frac{z^2}{2!} + \frac{z^3}{3!} + \cdots

Step 2: f(z)=1z2(1+z+z22+z36+⋯ )=1z2+1z+12+z6+β‹―f(z) = \frac{1}{z^2}\left(1 + z + \frac{z^2}{2} + \frac{z^3}{6} + \cdots\right) = \frac{1}{z^2} + \frac{1}{z} + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{z}{6} + \cdots

Step 3: The Laurent series has finitely many negative-power terms (up to zβˆ’2z^{-2}), with cβˆ’2=1β‰ 0c_{-2} = 1 \neq 0.

Conclusion: z=0z = 0 is a pole of order 2 (double pole).


Practice Problems

πŸ“Problem 1: Cauchy-Riemann Verification

Verify that f(z)=ezf(z) = e^z is entire.

πŸ’‘Solution

f(z)=ex+iy=excos⁑y+iexsin⁑yf(z) = e^{x+iy} = e^x\cos y + ie^x\sin y, so u=excos⁑yu = e^x\cos y and v=exsin⁑yv = e^x\sin y.

ux=excos⁑yu_x = e^x\cos y, vy=excos⁑yv_y = e^x\cos y βœ“

uy=βˆ’exsin⁑yu_y = -e^x\sin y, βˆ’vx=βˆ’exsin⁑y-v_x = -e^x\sin y βœ“

The Cauchy-Riemann equations are satisfied everywhere, and the partials are continuous everywhere. Therefore eze^z is entire.

fβ€²(z)=ux+ivx=excos⁑y+iexsin⁑y=ezf'(z) = u_x + iv_x = e^x\cos y + ie^x\sin y = e^z.

πŸ“Problem 2: Harmonic Conjugate

Find the harmonic conjugate of u(x,y)=excos⁑yu(x,y) = e^x\cos y.

πŸ’‘Solution

Step 1: Check harmonicity: uxx=excos⁑yu_{xx} = e^x\cos y, uyy=βˆ’excos⁑yu_{yy} = -e^x\cos y. Sum = 0 βœ“.

Step 2: From Cauchy-Riemann: vy=ux=excos⁑yv_y = u_x = e^x\cos y and vx=βˆ’uy=exsin⁑yv_x = -u_y = e^x\sin y.

Step 3: Integrate vy=excos⁑yv_y = e^x\cos y: v=exsin⁑y+g(x)v = e^x\sin y + g(x).

Step 4: Differentiate: vx=exsin⁑y+gβ€²(x)=exsin⁑yv_x = e^x\sin y + g'(x) = e^x\sin y implies gβ€²(x)=0g'(x) = 0.

Result: v=exsin⁑y+Cv = e^x\sin y + C, and f(z)=excos⁑y+iexsin⁑y=ezf(z) = e^x\cos y + ie^x\sin y = e^z (consistent with the known form of the complex exponential).

πŸ“Problem 3: Conformal Mapping

Find the image of the line y=1y = 1 under the mapping w=z2w = z^2.

πŸ’‘Solution

Step 1: Parameterize: z=x+iz = x + i, so w=(x+i)2=x2βˆ’1+2xiw = (x+i)^2 = x^2 - 1 + 2xi.

Step 2: Write w=u+ivw = u + iv: u=x2βˆ’1u = x^2 - 1 and v=2xv = 2x.

Step 3: Eliminate xx: From v=2xv = 2x, we get x=v/2x = v/2. Substitute into uu:

u=(v/2)2βˆ’1=v2/4βˆ’1u = (v/2)^2 - 1 = v^2/4 - 1

So u=v2/4βˆ’1u = v^2/4 - 1, or equivalently v2=4(u+1)v^2 = 4(u + 1).

Result: This is a parabola opening to the right with vertex at (βˆ’1,0)(-1, 0) in the ww-plane.

πŸ“Problem 4: Singularity Analysis

Find and classify all singularities of f(z)=z(zβˆ’1)(z+2)f(z) = \frac{z}{(z-1)(z+2)}.

πŸ’‘Solution

Step 1: The function is undefined at z=1z = 1 and z=βˆ’2z = -2. These are isolated singularities.

Step 2: At z=1z = 1: lim⁑zβ†’1(zβˆ’1)f(z)=lim⁑zβ†’1zz+2=13β‰ 0\lim_{z \to 1} (z-1)f(z) = \lim_{z \to 1} \frac{z}{z+2} = \frac{1}{3} \neq 0. Simple pole (order 1).

Residue: Res⁑(f,1)=13\operatorname{Res}(f, 1) = \frac{1}{3}.

Step 3: At z=βˆ’2z = -2: lim⁑zβ†’βˆ’2(z+2)f(z)=lim⁑zβ†’βˆ’2zzβˆ’1=βˆ’2βˆ’3=23β‰ 0\lim_{z \to -2} (z+2)f(z) = \lim_{z \to -2} \frac{z}{z-1} = \frac{-2}{-3} = \frac{2}{3} \neq 0. Simple pole.

Residue: Res⁑(f,βˆ’2)=23\operatorname{Res}(f, -2) = \frac{2}{3}.

Verification by partial fractions: z(zβˆ’1)(z+2)=Azβˆ’1+Bz+2\frac{z}{(z-1)(z+2)} = \frac{A}{z-1} + \frac{B}{z+2}. Solving: A=1/3A = 1/3, B=2/3B = 2/3. βœ“

πŸ“Problem 5: Laplace Equation Solution

Solve βˆ‡2u=0\nabla^2 u = 0 in the upper half-plane with boundary condition u(x,0)=eβˆ’x2u(x, 0) = e^{-x^2}.

πŸ’‘Solution

Since uu is harmonic in the upper half-plane with given boundary data, we can find a conformal mapping to transform this to a simpler domain, or use the Poisson integral formula for the half-plane:

u(x,y)=yΟ€βˆ«βˆ’βˆžβˆžeβˆ’t2(xβˆ’t)2+y2dtu(x, y) = \frac{y}{\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-t^2}}{(x-t)^2 + y^2} dt

Alternatively, note that eβˆ’z2e^{-z^2} is entire, so eβˆ’z2=eβˆ’(x2βˆ’y2)[cos⁑(2xy)βˆ’isin⁑(2xy)]e^{-z^2} = e^{-(x^2-y^2)}[\cos(2xy) - i\sin(2xy)] is analytic. Its real part u(x,y)=eβˆ’(x2βˆ’y2)cos⁑(2xy)u(x,y) = e^{-(x^2-y^2)}\cos(2xy) is harmonic.

Check boundary: u(x,0)=eβˆ’x2cos⁑(0)=eβˆ’x2u(x, 0) = e^{-x^2}\cos(0) = e^{-x^2} βœ“

So u(x,y)=eβˆ’(x2βˆ’y2)cos⁑(2xy)u(x,y) = e^{-(x^2-y^2)}\cos(2xy) is a solution.


Common Mistakes

MistakeCorrectionExample
Assuming real differentiability implies complex differentiabilityThe function zβ€Ύ\overline{z} is real-differentiable but not complex-differentiablezβ€Ύ\overline{z} fails Cauchy-Riemann
Forgetting continuity of partials in the sufficiency conditionCauchy-Riemann + continuity of partials β†’ analyticity; without continuity, C-R may hold but fβ€²f' may not existNeed ux,uy,vx,vyu_x, u_y, v_x, v_y continuous
Confusing sin⁑z\sin z with sin⁑(x+iy)\sin(x+iy) real trigonometricsin⁑(x+iy)=sin⁑xcosh⁑y+icos⁑xsinh⁑y\sin(x+iy) = \sin x\cosh y + i\cos x\sinh y β€” it's unbounded!βˆ₯sin⁑(iy)βˆ₯=βˆ₯sinh⁑yβˆ₯\|\sin(iy)\| = \|\sinh y\| grows without bound
Assuming eze^z is one-to-oneeze^z is periodic: ez+2Ο€i=eze^{z+2\pi i} = e^z; it maps horizontal strips to Cβˆ–{0}\mathbb{C} \setminus \{0\}e0=e2Ο€i=1e^0 = e^{2\pi i} = 1
Wrong sign in Cauchy-RiemannIt's ux=vyu_x = v_y and uy=βˆ’vxu_y = -v_x, not ux=vxu_x = v_xCommon sign error
Assuming conformality at critical pointsWhere fβ€²(z0)=0f'(z_0) = 0, the mapping is NOT conformal (angles may not be preserved)w=z2w = z^2 at z=0z = 0: angles double
Forgetting that harmonic conjugates are unique only up to a constantvv and v+Cv + C are both conjugates of uuDifferent choices of CC give different ff

Interview / Exam Questions

Q1: What is the relationship between analytic functions and harmonic functions?

A1: If f(z)=u+ivf(z) = u + iv is analytic, then both uu and vv are harmonic (satisfy Laplace's equation). Conversely, in a simply connected domain, every harmonic function uu has a harmonic conjugate vv such that u+ivu + iv is analytic. This is because the Cauchy-Riemann equations ux=vyu_x = v_y and uy=βˆ’vxu_y = -v_x imply uxx+uyy=vxx+vyy=0u_{xx} + u_{yy} = v_{xx} + v_{yy} = 0. The connection is deep: harmonic functions are the real or imaginary parts of analytic functions, and conformal mappings transform harmonic functions from one domain to another.


Q2: Why is complex differentiability so much more restrictive than real differentiability?

A2: In the real case, fβ€²(x)=lim⁑hβ†’0[f(x+h)βˆ’f(x)]/hf'(x) = \lim_{h \to 0} [f(x+h) - f(x)]/h only requires agreement from two directions (left and right). In the complex case, fβ€²(z)=lim⁑hβ†’0[f(z+h)βˆ’f(z)]/hf'(z) = \lim_{h \to 0} [f(z+h) - f(z)]/h must give the same limit from every direction in the plane β€” the real axis, imaginary axis, and all other approaches. This is a much stronger condition, captured precisely by the Cauchy-Riemann equations. The result is that complex differentiability implies infinite smoothness and representability by power series, which never happens in real analysis.


Q3: Describe the geometric effect of the mapping w=z2w = z^2 near z0=1z_0 = 1.

A3: At z0=1z_0 = 1, fβ€²(1)=2f'(1) = 2. The mapping scales by ∣fβ€²(1)∣=2|f'(1)| = 2 and rotates by arg⁑fβ€²(1)=0\arg f'(1) = 0. Near z0=1z_0 = 1, z2z^2 acts like a linear map that doubles distances and preserves angles. Since fβ€²(1)β‰ 0f'(1) \neq 0, the mapping is conformal at z0=1z_0 = 1: angles between curves are preserved.

At z0=0z_0 = 0, fβ€²(0)=0f'(0) = 0, so the mapping is not conformal. The angle between two curves through the origin is doubled.


Q4: What are the three types of isolated singularities, and how do you distinguish them?

A4: An isolated singularity z0z_0 of ff is:

  1. Removable if ff can be redefined at z0z_0 to be analytic. The Laurent series has no negative powers, and lim⁑zβ†’z0(zβˆ’z0)f(z)=0\lim_{z \to z_0} (z-z_0)f(z) = 0.
  2. A pole of order nn if f(z)∼c/(zβˆ’z0)nf(z) \sim c/(z-z_0)^n as zβ†’z0z \to z_0. The Laurent series has finitely many negative powers, and lim⁑zβ†’z0(zβˆ’z0)nf(z)β‰ 0\lim_{z \to z_0} (z-z_0)^n f(z) \neq 0.
  3. Essential if the Laurent series has infinitely many negative powers. Equivalently, lim⁑zβ†’z0(zβˆ’z0)nf(z)=∞\lim_{z \to z_0} (z-z_0)^n f(z) = \infty for all nn.

Q5: If ff is analytic and ∣f∣|f| has a local maximum at an interior point, what can you conclude?

A5: By the Maximum Modulus Principle, ff must be constant on the domain. This is a powerful rigidity result: analytic functions cannot have interior local maxima of their modulus (unless they are constant). This principle is used to prove uniqueness theorems, bound analytic functions, and establish that polynomials map circles to curves that enclose the same area. It also implies that the maximum of ∣f∣|f| on a closed bounded domain is always achieved on the boundary.


Q6: Construct the harmonic conjugate of u=x3βˆ’3xy2u = x^3 - 3xy^2 and form the analytic function f(z)f(z).

A6: Check: uxx=6xu_{xx} = 6x, uyy=βˆ’6xu_{yy} = -6x, so uxx+uyy=0u_{xx} + u_{yy} = 0 βœ“ (harmonic).

From C-R: vy=ux=3x2βˆ’3y2v_y = u_x = 3x^2 - 3y^2 and vx=βˆ’uy=6xyv_x = -u_y = 6xy.

Integrate vx=6xyv_x = 6xy: v=3x2y+h(y)v = 3x^2y + h(y). Differentiate: vy=3x2+hβ€²(y)=3x2βˆ’3y2v_y = 3x^2 + h'(y) = 3x^2 - 3y^2, so hβ€²(y)=βˆ’3y2h'(y) = -3y^2, h(y)=βˆ’y3+Ch(y) = -y^3 + C.

v=3x2yβˆ’y3+Cv = 3x^2y - y^3 + C.

f(z)=(x3βˆ’3xy2)+i(3x2yβˆ’y3)+iC=z3+iCf(z) = (x^3 - 3xy^2) + i(3x^2y - y^3) + iC = z^3 + iC. (Indeed, (x+iy)3=x3βˆ’3xy2+i(3x2yβˆ’y3)(x+iy)^3 = x^3 - 3xy^2 + i(3x^2y - y^3).)


Quick Reference

πŸ“‹Formula Summary

FormulaExpressionNotes
Cauchy-Riemannux=vyu_x = v_y, uy=βˆ’vxu_y = -v_xNecessary + sufficient (with continuity)
Derivativefβ€²=ux+ivx=vyβˆ’iuyf' = u_x + iv_x = v_y - iu_yEither form works
Complex exponentialez=ex(cos⁑y+isin⁑y)e^z = e^x(\cos y + i\sin y)Periodic in imaginary direction
Complex sinesin⁑z=sin⁑xcosh⁑y+icos⁑xsinh⁑y\sin z = \sin x\cosh y + i\cos x\sinh yUnbounded in complex plane
Complex cosinecos⁑z=cos⁑xcosh⁑yβˆ’isin⁑xsinh⁑y\cos z = \cos x\cosh y - i\sin x\sinh yUnbounded in complex plane
Complex logarithmlog⁑z=ln⁑βˆ₯zβˆ₯+iarg⁑z\log z = \ln\|z\| + i\arg zMulti-valued; branch cuts needed
Laplace equationuxx+uyy=0u_{xx} + u_{yy} = 0Real/imaginary parts of analytic ff
Harmonic conjugatevy=uxv_y = u_x, vx=βˆ’uyv_x = -u_yIntegrate to find vv from uu
MΓΆbius transformw=(az+b)/(cz+d)w = (az+b)/(cz+d)Maps circles to circles
Conformality conditionff analytic, fβ€²(z0)β‰ 0f'(z_0) \neq 0Preserves angles at z0z_0
Maximum modulusβˆ₯fβˆ₯\|f\| max on boundaryNon-constant analytic functions
Laurent seriesf(z)=βˆ‘n=βˆ’βˆžβˆžcn(zβˆ’z0)nf(z) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} c_n(z-z_0)^nReveals singularity type

Cross-References

  • 091 - Complex Numbers β€” The algebraic foundations (modulus, argument, polar form) underpin all function theory.
  • 093 - Contour Integration β€” Cauchy's theorem and integral formula are consequences of analyticity; they are the computational engine of complex analysis.
  • 094 - Residue Theory β€” Poles and essential singularities (classified here) are the objects whose residues are computed.
  • 095 - Applications β€” Fourier transforms, filter design, and conformal mappings to physical domains rely on the properties of analytic functions.
  • Partial Differential Equations β€” Harmonic functions arise as steady-state solutions; conformal mappings transform Laplace's equation between domains.
  • Fluid Dynamics (Topic 25): Velocity potentials and stream functions are harmonic conjugates; conformal mappings solve flow problems around obstacles.
Lesson Progress92 / 100